The use of the doctrine is highly limited and is confined to cases where the facts permit an inference to be drawn and there is no other reasonable explanation as to why or how the accident occurred. If there is direct and circumstantial evidence which establishes a prima facie case of negligence, the defendant ought to lead evidence offering an explanation to negate the plaintiff's case (Fontaine v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, (1997), 1998 CanLII 814 (SCC), 156 D.L.R. (4th) 577).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.