What is the effect of mootness on the exercise of a court’s discretion?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Saskatoon Regional Health Authority and Johnson, 2014 SKQB 266 (CanLII):
This submission involves a consideration of Borowski v. Canada (Attorney General), 1989 CanLII 123 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 342, 57 D.L.R. (4th) 231. Sopinka J. stated at page 353: 15 The doctrine of mootness is an aspect of a general policy or practice that a court may decline to decide a case which raises merely a hypothetical or abstract question. The general principle applies when the decision of the court will not have the effect of resolving some controversy which affects or may affect the rights of the parties. If the decision of the court will have no practical effect on such rights, the court will decline to decide the case. This essential ingredient must be present not only when the action or proceeding is commenced but at the time when the court is called upon to reach a decision. Accordingly if, subsequent to the initiation of the action or proceeding, events occur which affect the relationship of the parties so that no present live controversy exists which affects the rights of the parties, the case is said to be moot. The general policy or practice is enforced in moot cases unless the court exercises its discretion to depart from its policy or practice. The relevant factors relating to the exercise of the court’s discretion are discussed hereinafter. [emphasis added]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of section 4(1) of the Statement of Claimant's Affidavit to the Court of Appeal allowing the Court to consider any evidence which is not confined to facts which the deponent is able to prove? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court exercise its discretion in deciding whether or not to grant damages to a plaintiff in a personal injury case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any jurisdiction to interfere in a finding of fact from the lower courts? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of the Courts of Equity’s jurisdiction on the terms of a personal injury agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that the contents of the document can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that its contents can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court review a decision by a majority of the Court of Appeal not adjourning on a motion of appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When a vendor contracts to sell to a purchaser an agreement for a lease and the purchaser subsequently repudiates the contract, can the vendor continue to exercise its right to exercise that right? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the relevant factors that a court will consider in determining whether or not to exercise jurisdiction? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's decision not to disturb the findings of fact review? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
