The defendant argues that the claim is modest and that there is no work loss. The defendant does not suggest any malingering nor that there is anything complicated about the case. However the defendant says that there is the serious inconsistency in the plaintiff's evidence which should be investigated at trial. The defendant argues that this extends to the plaintiff's credibility. Therefore the defendant argues this is not a proper case to be decided pursuant to Rule 18A (Brayshaw v. Sommerfeld, [1996] B.C.J. No. 432 (S.C.)).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.