Assuming that the legislative exception does not apply, the decision here can be characterized as a ministerial decision made on grounds of public policy. It was a decision made under the Minister’s statutory authority to manage the conservancy and apparently in accordance with the 2010 Protected Area Policy. A purely ministerial decision made on broad grounds of public policy will not typically afford procedural protection: see Martineau v. Matsqui Institution, 1979 CanLII 184 (SCC), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 602. However, the decision affected the individual interests of the Petitioners.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.