What is the case law in which a judge improperly interpreted a restrictive covenant to protect views?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Zhang v. Davies, 2018 BCCA 99 (CanLII):
The Davies submit the decision in Hofer v. Guitonni, 2011 BCCA 393, supports their contention that the judge improperly “read in” a provision that the restrictive covenant was to protect views.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a covenant that restricts the use of land a restrictive covenant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the meaning of the Covenant and what is the interpretation of the covenant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for overturning a chambers judge's finding that a section of statutory interpretation of the Statutory Interpretation of Section 5(1) of the Criminal Code applies to a person who is not a party to the legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How are restrictive covenants interpreted? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a restrictive covenant, what can be said to have been the object or purpose at the time of the covenant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a restrictive covenant in an employment contract more restrictive than in a contract for sale and purchase of a business? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BC government's policy of not funding interpretation services for deaf patients been interpreted in conjunction with receipt of medical care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge vary the order of a single judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a judge’s role as an appellate judge to second-guess the weight of evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a judge to depart from another judge's judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
