The “critical analysis” to be avoided is one relating to the approving officer’s reasons for reaching a decision. On the other hand, a careful assessment of the evidence the approving officer relies upon to base his or her decision is quite proper, as such a review could disclose a completely inadequate factual foundation for the decision or bad faith on the part of the approving officer: Moore v. Saanich (District) (1995), 13 B.C.L.R. (3d) 20 (S.C.). Facts
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.