Within the context of a landlord/tenant relationship, the covenant of “quiet enjoyment” protects the tenant’s right to freedom from serious interferences with his or her tenancy. In a case within which similar conduct was considered, it was held that a landlord can be insistent and persistent and even rude in taking measures provided by the law to pursue his right to evict for a serious breach by a tenant. However, when there is an element of direct physical interference by repeatedly knocking on the door and shouting threats, that element of direct physical interference is not trivial, but substantial. [See Kenny v. Preen (1963) 1 QB 499, (1962) 3 All ER 814 (C.A.)].
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.