Thus, when justice requires a fair trial and a fair appeal it may be said that a failure of natural justice at the original hearing cannot be cured at the appellate level. It may also be said that where the appeal stage is akin to a trial de novo the subsequent hearing may cure the defect in the first hearing. Such was the case in Harelkin v. University of Regina, 1979 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1979] 2 S.C.R. 561. As to procedures that fall between these two extremes, the authorities are less clear. The most that can be said with clarity is that, where the procedure is consensual, as with a voluntary organization, the test is overall fairness.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.