For the reasons that follow, I would allow the appeal and order a new trial for two reasons, each of which, in my view, is sufficient to warrant appellate interference: 1) Browne v. Dunn has no application to the circumstances of this case, and 2) the judge relied upon matters not in evidence to discount the appellant’s evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.