This approach is flexible and enables the courts to “identify circumstances where justice and fairness require one party to restore a benefit to another”: Moore, at para. 38. The onus is on the applicant to satisfy a prima facie finding of unjust enrichment, at which point the respondent may put forth defences or explanations: Granger v. Granger, 2016 ONCA 945, 133 O.R. (3d) 641, at para. 75. The Estates are Clearly Enriched:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.