Moreover, the general rule is that appellate courts will not entertain entirely new issues on appeal. The rationale for the rule is that it is unfair to spring a new argument upon a party at the hearing of an appeal in circumstances in which evidence might have been led at first instance if it had been known that the matter would be an issue on appeal: Kaiman v. Graham, 2009 ONCA 77 (C.A.) (CanLII) at para 18.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.