In Ladouceur v. Howarth, 1973 CanLII 30 (SCC), [1974] S.C.R. 1111, the plaintiff sought an amendment to change the name of the plaintiff from the son to the father. Spence J. found that this was a case of misnaming a person and was a typical example of a misnomer. In concluding that the amendment should be granted, he cited at para. 12 the following principle; “The general principle underlying all the cases is that the court should amend, where the opposite party has not been misled, or substantially injured by the error”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.