In Lewicki et al v. Dixie Electric Ltd. (1995), 61 C.P.R. (3d) 75, at p. 78, the court set out a three part test: (1) there is a serious issue to be tried, or there is a prima facie case; (2) the harm to the applicant, caused by the defendant's infringement, is irreparable and non-compensable in damages; and (3) the balance of convenience lies with the applicant; where the factors appear to be evenly balanced, it is preferable to maintain the status quo.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.