Under Rule 37, a party’s entitlement to costs was primarily determined by whether the ultimate award was more money or less money than the amount set out in the offer to settle. The court retained some discretion with respect to costs regardless of this result, but there needed to be very good reasons to depart from the consequences of the Rule: Brown v. Lowe, 2002 BCCA 7.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.