[82] In Denis v. Oborowsk, the court found no evidence that children’s needs were not being met in the current custodial arrangement.[14] Further the court received no clear evidence that the children’s lives would be enhanced by the proposed move. The court concluded therefore that there was no evidence to show that the move was being made to meet the needs of the children and the move was not permitted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.