Urquhart v. Allen Estate, [1999] O.J. No. 4816 (S.C.J.), addressed a proposal that evidence on one issue be presented at a different time than evidence on another. In rejecting that suggestion Gillese J. (as she then was) wrote: 26. The testimony of the plaintiff is a whole. Her evidence cannot be severed with some portions of it going in on the main trial and some segments of it being entered later after the evidence of her other witnesses. Her credibility is a function of her whole testimony.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.