What is the test for determining whether there is a genuine issue requiring a trial based on evidence filed without using Rule 20?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Zachariadis Estate v. Giannopoulos, 2019 ONSC 6505 (CanLII):

The court must first determine whether there is a genuine issue requiring a trial based on the evidence filed without using the fact-finding powers prescribed by Rule 20. This occurs when the judge can make the necessary findings of fact and the judge can apply the law to the facts: Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014, SCC 7, at paras. 49, 66.

The evidence must be such that the judge is confident that he or she can fairly resolve the dispute: Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014, SCC 7, at paras. 50 and 57.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining if a motion is a genuine issue requiring a trial based only on the evidence in the Motion Record? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the factors used in determining whether there is a risk of danger based on circumstantial evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a genuine issue requiring trial about whether the connecting nut in the flex hose was defective at the time of installation? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a genuine issue requiring a trial for public nuisance? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a genuine issue exists under the Child Protection Act? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any reversible error in a motion finding that there is no genuine issue requiring a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
In determining whether an employer has led sufficient evidence to give rise to a practical evidentiary burden, what is the test for this type of evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any genuine issue requiring a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining a genuine issue for trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the evidentiary burden of proving there is no genuine issue requiring a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.