Is there a juristic reason for the enrichment received by D.A. as a result of his employment benefits?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from S.C. v. D.A., 2012 BCSC 1061 (CanLII):
In my view, the parties bestowed benefits on each other in such a manner as to obviate the conclusion that there was no juristic reason for the enrichment received by D.A. In Thomas v. Fenton, 2006 BCCA 299, Kirkpatrick J.A. said:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If an employer loses trust in an employee as a result of an employer's orders, in the matter of substance being willfully disobeyed and met with insubordination, can an employer dismiss the employee? (British Columbia, Canada)
On a value survived approach, is a party entitled to claim the value of services and other benefits received by the enriched party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a juristic reason in a claim for wrongful enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the defaulting employer have the onus of demonstrating that the employee failed to make reasonable efforts to find an alternative employment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the absence of juristic reason for enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a risk of irreparable harm to an employer if an employee loses their employment benefits? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a contract be used as a juristic reason for enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the argument that appeal is from a result not a reason but a reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a contract be used as a juristic reason sufficient to defeat a claim of unjust enrichment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there has been a juristic reason for enrichment in a common law relationship? (British Columbia, Canada)
