It would be wrong to require a physician to practice to a standard that anticipated a worse case scenario as the risk and elevate the standard of practice accordingly. We know the standard of practice applied has a degree of risk. We know now that additional communication and checks could have prevented the delay in obtaining a diagnosis. But the court must be careful not to rely upon the perfect vision afforded by hindsight. See Lapointe v. Hospital LeGardeur, 1992 [SCJ No. 11, 28].
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.