In this case, the plaintiff’s injuries were caused by one of two car accidents, or contributed to by both. Although both accidents were separate events, the question of the extent to which either or both contributed to the plaintiff’s injuries create a sufficient factual link between them to support a Bullock or Sanderson order. This was the view taken by Eberle J. in Cheskin v. Schrage [3], and one which I follow.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.