By analogy, the appellant argued that a conditional order (if the conditions were met and arrears fully paid) could not be acted upon and the landlord could not take possession of the premises. This was the finding of Malone J. in Browne v. Boardwalk Equities (Sask.) Inc., 2011 SKQB 330, [2011] S.J. No. 546 (QL). Malone J. also found a landlord could not rely upon arrears which did not exist at the time of the hearing. Further, he found that where arrears were paid after an order for possession was granted, it would be fair to remit the matter back to the original hearing officer for further consideration.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.