I emphasized the line, “absent contributory negligence” in para. 32 to clarify that I understand the court to be saying, if a plaintiff is contributorily negligent, she loses the right to a joint and several judgment; that is, the judgment is issued severally and she may only recover the respective damages that each tortfeasor is at fault for. The distinction between “causation” and “fault” is critical. This distinction was articulated in Karran v. Anderson, 2009 BCSC 1105:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.