The availability of a safe avenue of escape removes the defence of duress. The reason being is that “if the accused had the chance to take action that would have allowed him or her to avoid committing the offence, it cannot be said that he or she had no real choice when deciding whether or not to break the law”; Hibbert v. The Queen (supra) at p.228.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.