The trial judge referred for guidance to Parhar v. Parhar, 2000 BCSC 1716, and Mather v. Mather, 2006 BCSC 393, where the matrimonial home was reapportioned 70/30 and 75/25 respectively in the wife’s favour. He noted that in the case at bar the husband had made a greater pre-marital contribution to the matrimonial home and he concluded that in all the circumstances a 64/36 division was fair.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.