At para. 36 of her reasons, Arbour J. stated the test as given in Yebes by McIntyre J. at p. 185. He had repeated the test as stated by Pigeon J. in Corbett v. The Queen, 1973 CanLII 199 (SCC), [1975] 2 S.C.R. 275, at p. 282: “The function of the court is not to substitute itself for the jury, but to decide whether the verdict is one that a properly instructed jury acting judicially, could reasonably have rendered.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.