The test, while ultimately the objective one of "the reasonable person", requires consideration of the plaintiff’s subjective knowledge of "his or her own circumstances and interests". I see no error in the judge’s statement that: Here the trial judge will have to consider the actions of a reasonable person in the particular plaintiff’s circumstances: Novak v. Bond, 1999 CanLII 685 (SCC), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 808.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.