In R v. Makhota [2004] O.J. No. 5415, P.J. Wright J. held that there must be direct evidence of the officer suspecting that the accused had alcohol in his system: Nowhere, did the officer say in his evidence that he formed a suspicion that the defendant had alcohol in his system. While inferences could be drawn from the facts, the legislation is framed in such a manner that I must receive direct evidence of that factor. It is not something that I may infer, however attractive or persuasive it would be to do so.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.