The Court of Appeal Maddalena v. Crouse, supra, case upheld the decision of Lofchik J. and stated that "There was no indication that the legislature intended to limit employee coverage to those employees who did not own vehicles covered by other policies. A plain reading of the statute led to the conclusion that the insured automobile could not be the same vehicle as the uninsured vehicle" (emphasis added).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.