In Andryechen v. Transit Insurance Co.[37], an insurer alleged that a theft of a truck was arranged by the owner in order to avoid vehicle repair costs. Although the insurer had not satisfied the onus of proving fraud on a balance of probabilities, the court nevertheless denied the plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages and held that it was reasonable for the insurance company to pursue a defence of fraud and that there was no evidence to support a finding that it’s behaviour was malicious, vindictive or reprehensible. The court stated “the fact that the defence failed does not convince me that the decision to defend was totally without merit”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.