How has this been interpreted by this court in the context of perjury cases?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Holland v. Douglas, 2010 BCSC 96 (CanLII):
This decision was followed by Collver J. of this court in Turner v. Cuttler, [1997] B.C.J. 1014, where defence counsel was accused in the statement of claim of wilfully, deliberately, and intentionally committing perjury during a taxation hearing before a master, and for failing to act properly as an officer of the court in a chambers hearing, where it was alleged he made misrepresentations of fact and was deceitful in nature.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that the doctrine of common law must be interpreted in the context of the common law context? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which the Court of Appeal has found that there is no case law to be relied upon in the context of the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a court to interpret the interpretation of the House of Commons Bill of Representatives in the context of cross-party legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the "Koursk" case law in the context of joint enterprise? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the law in the context of medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted contracts in the context of the interpretation of contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the rule of common law in the context of personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court interpreted the meaning of the phrase “adequate, just and equitable” in the context of the maintenance of the spouse's children? (British Columbia, Canada)
