What is the legal test for a court to interpret the interpretation of the House of Commons Bill of Representatives in the context of cross-party legislation?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from University of British Columbia v. British Columbia College of Teachers, 2001 BCSC 792 (CanLII):
As a matter of construction, a court will, where possible, prefer an interpretation that permits the reconciliation of two legislative initiatives: Friends of the Oldman River Society v. Canada (Minister of Transport) (1992), 1992 CanLII 110 (SCC), 88 D.L.R. (4th) 1 (S.C.C.) at p. 23
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court in BCSC 871 interpret the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of the Canadian Court of Justice's decision on the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that the doctrine of common law must be interpreted in the context of the common law context? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted "common intention" in the context of a common intention claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for interpreting legislation in the context of municipal legislation in Whistler? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted contracts in the context of the interpretation of contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the rule of common law in the context of personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for procedural fairness in the context of legislation being considered in the House of Representatives? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care required by common law by the common law under common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a personal representative of the deceased's estate make a claim under s. 151(3) of the BC Supreme Court of Justice for personal representative leave to continue to pursue his claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the court interpreted vulnerability in the context of a fiduciary duty of trust in an investment relationship? (British Columbia, Canada)
