The decision in Shaw v. Foster (1872) L.R. 5 H.L. 321, 42 L.J. Ch. 49, does not apply to the facts of the present case. In that case the purchaser deposited his contract with a bank and agreed in writing to execute a valid assignment of the contract to the bank if the bank should at any time request him to do so. The bank gave the vendor notice of this agreement but made no further communication to him until after the sale was completed. On these facts it was held that the vendor was not bound by the notice and was not put on inquiry whether the purchaser had been requested to make or had made a valid assignment. There was also no notice of the deposit of the contract as there was in the present case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.