More recently, the same issue was considered by Justice Cullen in Luedecke v. Hillman, 2010 BCSC 1538, an appeal from a master’s order which allowed an examination to provide “truly responsive” evidence. The court upheld the master's order, determining that the necessary evidentiary basis for an examination was found in the material presented. In doing so, the court confirms that: To reach the requisite threshold under Rule 11-6(4) the applicant must establish a basis of necessity for the examination to properly respond to the expert witness whose report is served under subrule (3) by the other party: para. 54.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.