The decision of Mazur v. Lucas deals with the admissibility of expert reports containing hearsay evidence. It is in relation to medical expert reports and not specifically with accelerated depreciation. The law on this issue was summarized by the court and included the following: …. The weight the trier of fact places on the opinion of the expert may depend on the degree to which the underlying assumptions have been proven by other admissible evidence. Where the hearsay evidence (such as the opinion of other physicians) is an accepted means of decision making within the expert’s expertise, the hearsay may have greater reliability. Page 14
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.