Jensen v. MacGregor is also applicable in this case. In Jensen, the plaintiff and his wife separated and his wife retained the defendant solicitors for legal advice about that separation. The plaintiff alleged that as a result of that advice his wife reduced his access to the couple’s children. The plaintiff asserted that defence counsel owed him a duty of care and had a duty to act in the best interests of the children. Defence counsel then applied under Rule 19(24) for an order striking out the statement of claim. Madam Justice Sinclair Prowse granted the application on the basis that a lawyer only owes a duty to the court and to his or her client.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.