In Jensen v. Jensen, [1994] B.C.J. No. 2603 (S.C.), the court considered a short marriage of two and a half years in which the couple had lived on the husband’s income alone, with some small contribution by the wife to the redecorating and renovation of his properties. In reapportioning the asset 90/10 in the husband’s favour, Baker J. wrote at para. 47: In my view, the authorities establish that the division of assets, following the breakdown of a marriage of very short duration between two mature adults, should not result in a considerable financial windfall to one of the parties. Marriage is not a legal institution created for the redistribution of wealth.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.