What is the current state of the law on nominal damages in personal injury cases?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Serban v. Egolf, 1983 CanLII 433 (BC SC):

A somewhat different approach was taken by Maule J. in Beaumont v. Greathead (1846), 2 C.B. 494 at 499, 135 E.R. 1039, who categorized nominal damages as "a mere peg on which to hang costs”. This approach no doubt was appropriate at the time, considering the law relating to costs then existing, but today it is not a relevant consideration in view of the wide discretion in the court.

Other Questions


In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on the basis of actuarial analysis in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for loss of personal capacity in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in Canada on damages under the common law for personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on medical justification for medical expenses in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.