If the factual situation was pled in terms of duty, breach and damage relating to negligent building of the house, would that pleading have been sufficient?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Peterson v. Lukinuk, 1988 CanLII 3799 (AB QB):

I would be quite prepared to hold, following the reasoning in Bailey v. Reynolds, supra, that had the factual situation been pled in terms of duty, breach and damage relating to negligent building of the house, the pleading would have sufficed, but clearly it was directed to different issues altogether and the defendants framed their defence on those other issues.

Other Questions


What is the legal test for damages for psychological damage arising from a breach of contract? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a term in the lease stating that a breach by the tenant is determined upon any breach of the lease constitute a proviso for re-entry? (Alberta, Canada)
Are damages sufficient for Delta to recover damages? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in relation to property damage claims in negligence? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the scope of the duty of care and damages recoverable for the breach? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for damages for damage caused by a breach of the law by a party to a property? (Alberta, Canada)
Is an application to strike out a pleading on the ground it does not disclose a cause of action an attack on the sufficiency of the pleading? (Alberta, Canada)
Is Rule 11 sufficient to deal with a more complex factual situation at the Bar? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a cause of action against a government authority for negligent breach of statutory duty? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law in which an architect has been successful in claiming damages from a building owner for breach of contract? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.