[67] I do not agree with this interpretation of Justice Aston’s position since, in this case, unlike the one before Justice Aston, no disposition order has been made. Therefore, I find that the case of Children s Aid Society of London and Middlesex v. Roxanne W., above, is distinguishable from this case since, there, a final disposition order of 12-month society wardship was made that exceeded the 24-month rule. In the present case, no disposition order has been made and therefore there has been no violation of the 24-month rule.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.