It is contended on behalf of the appellant that, under the wording of this rule, as a party giving evidence at the trial would not be compelled to leave the witness stand and inform himself on matters of which he had no knowledge, likewise he should not be required to do so in an examination for discovery. In support of this contention the case of Brydon Jack v. Vancouver Printing Co., 16 B.C.R. 55 ; 16 W.L.R. 262, is referred to.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.