A similar issue arose in Bilkey et al v. Paul et al, 2004 BCSC 167 where the lenders under a demand mortgage granted to a family member sought to introduce evidence that they never intended to demand repayment until the borrower’s death. As in the case at bar, the question before the court was whether the claim on the mortgage was statute barred. Mr. Justice Edwards held the evidence of intention to be inadmissible:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.