The following excerpt is from Security Lumber Company, Ltd. v. Leibrand and Foil, 1923 CanLII 183 (SK CA):
To adopt this language to the case at bar, I would say that we have here not an application in an action made either before or after final judgment and which might therefore be interlocutory (Blakey v. Latham, 43 Ch. D. 23), but a proceeding “the object of which as a matter of substance” is to dispose of the rights of the parties at trial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.