How has the court in Shepley considered "double dipping" in equalization payments?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Leitch v. Novac, 2019 ONSC 794 (CanLII):

The court in Shepley adverted to the principles in Boston v. Boston[83] with respect to the conclusion that “double dipping” was inequitable. However, the court cited Meiklejohn v. Meiklejohn,[84] for the proposition that in certain cases the rationale for avoiding double recovery is not applicable. In that case, the wife was in poor health and received only a modest equalization payment.

Other Questions


Can a court make a vesting order to ensure payment of equalization payments where the payor is unknown? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the range of equal share payments ordered by a court in a family law case? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a husband's pension be used as security for payment of an equalization payment? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of equalization payments in matrimonial home disputes? (Ontario, Canada)
In determining if a court order is necessary to protect a child in the future, can the court consider protection concerns other than that that resulted in the child coming into care? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the issue of double dipping from the remaining portion of the equalized pension remain? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court reduce the costs of a husband who successfully sued his wife for double dipping? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a double-dipping scheme where the husband's post-separation pension has not been equalized? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to order a transfer of a cause into this court from another court? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.