It is significant that no authority has been presented which supports this use of inherent jurisdiction. Madam Justice Southin in Ribeiro v. Vancouver (City) (2004), 245 D.L.R. (4th) 231, 2004 BCCA 482 at para. 3 succinctly addressed the advisability of a single judge embarking upon a novel procedure: … It is not appropriate for a single judge of the court below to engage in matters of practice and procedure in which I call judicial individualism. The course of the court below is the law of the court and the course has never been to engage in such a practice.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.