Dunlop, Creditor-Debtor Law in Canada (2nd ed.) says, pp. 37-38: An early British Columbia decision, if accepted, would have effectively reduced the legislation to little more than a restatement of the common law. In Bell v. Quagliotti Gregory J. observed that the word “agreement” should be read in the common law sense of a promise under seal or supported by consideration. This perverse reading has been rejected by several subsequent cases and it is now clear that “agreement” is intended to refer to an understanding or bargain in the ordinary sense of the terms, whether enforceable at common law or not. (emphasis mine)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.