As Dickson J. (as he then was) observed in Becker v. Pettkus, the common intention is rarely expressly stated, but must be gleaned from the conduct of the parties: at 843. In determining whether the necessary common intention existed, the court must take into account all the circumstances concerning the acquisition, preservation and improvement of the property: see Frederkind v. Frederkind, [1999] B.C.J. No. 2476, at para. 9.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.