Does the Charter protect against insignificant or trivial limitations to human rights?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Chu v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCSC 630 (CanLII):

Justice Karakatsanis, citing Cunningham v. Canada, 1993 CanLII 139 (SCC), [1993] 2 S.C.R. 143 at 151, accepted that the Charter does not protect against insignificant or trivial limitations of rights. She then explained the nature of the liberty or security interests which had to be engaged:

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Respondent at the Human Rights Tribunal of B.C. claim that the Applicant be denied the right to continue to pursue his human rights claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether the Human Rights Tribunal of BC has jurisdiction to hear a human rights complaint against the respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the limitations of medical records used to establish that a right leg injury was limited to his leg, and not affecting his right hip until October 2016? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for limiting the right to publication of a human rights case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the meaning of the language of the Canadian Human Rights Code in the context of human rights legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
When will the Court of Justice LaForme be able to continue to uphold the Charter of Canada's Charter of Human Rights? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the time limit for a human rights complaint to be heard in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for section 15(1) of the Charter of Canada’s Human Rights Act, s.15(1)? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for s. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Human Rights? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances has the Charter of Human Rights been expanded by the Court of Appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.