In some decisions emphasis is placed on whether the premises visited are business premises or a private dwelling house. In Dunster v. Abbott, [1954] 1 W.L.R. 58, [1953] 2 All E.R. 1572, a salesman soliciting advertising orders from a potential customer at his private home was held to be a licensee. Denning L.J. said at p. 1574: “A canvasser who comes on your premises without your consent is a trespasser. Once he has your consent, he is a licensee. Not until you do business with him is he an invitee ... “In the present case the canvasser, the plaintiff, came to the door; the householder, the defendant, asked him in; the plaintiff stated his business; the defendant was not interested; and the plaintiff left. On these facts I am clearly of the opinion that the plaintiff was not an invitee, but only a licensee, because he was there on his own business and not on any matter in which the defendant had an interest. We all know that a guest whom a householder invites to dinner is only a licensee, even though the householder has an ulterior business motive in asking him. It would be strange if a householder owed a higher duty to a canvasser who comes unasked than he does to a guest who comes on his express invitation.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.