Once the plaintiff establishes the defendant is liable for causing his or her injuries, the burden of proof shifts to the defendant. To succeed on a mitigation defence, the defence must prove: i) a rehabilitative program would have reduced or eliminated the effect of the injuries; ii) a reasonable plaintiff in the same circumstances would have followed such a program; iii) the plaintiff unreasonably failed to follow such a program; and iv) the extent to which the plaintiff's damages would have been reduced if he or she had followed such a program: Harris v. Zabaras, 2010 BCSC 97.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.