As stated by Wilkinson J. in Flash v. Flash, supra, at para. 27: . . . Some of the non-exhaustive factors to be considered in determining the best interests of the children in the context of a proposed relocation by a parent are: (a) the existing custody arrangement and the relationship between the child and the custodial parent. (b) the existing access arrangement and the relationship between the child and the access parent; (c) the desirability of maximizing contact between the child and both parents; (d) the views of the child; (e) the custodial parent’s reason for moving, only in the exceptional case where it is relevant to the parent’s ability to meet the needs of the child; (f) disruption to the child of a change in custody; and (g) disruption to the child consequent on removal from family, schools and the community he or she has come to know.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.